| Co-Chairs |
|
Gregory R. Mundy, MD
John A. Oates in Translational Medicine
Director, Vanderbilt Center for Bone Biology
Professor of Medicine, Pharmacology,
Orthopaedics, Cancer Biology
Vanderbilt University
Nashville, TN |
|
Allan Lipton, MD
Professor of Medicine & Oncology
M.S. Hershey Medical Center of the
Pennsylvania State University |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
CME Credit no londer available. This activity has expired.
CME-Accredited Webcasts, PowerPoint® Slide and Audio Downloads, and
i-Tunes Podcast Downloads
All 5 presentations and 5 case studies from the live course
"A New Targeted Strategy for Treating Bone Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients:
Inhibiting RANK Ligand"
Washington, D.C., September 6, 2008
|
You may participate in any or all of the 8 sessions for CME credit or Certificate of Attendance after you review the required ACCME (Accreditation Council on Continuing Medical Education) information on this and the following Web pages.
|
|
Menu
|
|
Overview of This CME-Accredited Educational Activity
Your Options for Methods of Participation are:
- View and/or listen to any of the sessions (listed below) via an Adobe Flash Webcast
- Download any slides as PowerPoint Presentations
- Download any audio only as MP3s or Podcasts
- Request a DVD-ROM of all sessions
|
These educational activities are the complete on-line, Web-based version of the "A New Targeted Strategy for Treating Bone Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients:
Inhibiting RANK Ligand" conducted September 6, 2008 in Washington, D.C.
There are 5 presentations and 5 clinical case studies. There are 8 sessions which vary in length and will permit you to earn up to 2 hours of AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Sessions can be individually reviewed for credit. You can participate in as few or as many as you desire.
CME-Accredited Educational Activity Dates and Time to Complete
Date of release: October 13, 2008
Date expires (CME credit will not be avaliable): October 13, 2009
Time to complete each individual session: 2 - 28 minutes
Time to complete entire activity: 2 hours
Overview
The practice of medicine and patient management for the treatment of bone metastases, and the management of bone health and bone integrity in breast cancer patients, continues to evolve and to include more effective therapies. This CME-accredited educational activity reviews the most up-to-date scientific and biologic data that can help physicians better understand the effects of both the breast malignancy and breast cancer therapies on the biology of the bone. It also reviews the challenges facing physicians who use the currently available therapeutic options for maintaining bone health and bone integrity in patients with breast cancer. Finally, this activity reviews a new approach to the treatment and management of these bone conditions, the inhibition of RANK Ligand.
The format of this activity is designed to maximize the use of adult learning principles.
Physician Practice Gap Summary and Educational Needs Assessment
The bone is the most common site of distant metastases in breast cancer. Bone metastases are a major source of morbidity in patients with breast cancer. Skeletal-related events from bone metastases include fractures, spinal cord compression, severe bone pain and hypercalcemia of malignancy.
An effective way to prevent skeletal-related events is to treat the cancer itself. However, the unique biology of bone metastasis warrants specific treatment approaches. Although radiopharmaceuticals are sometimes used to control bone pain, systemic treatment of patients with bone metastases is primarily with the use of bisphosphonates. The achieved mechanism of action for bisphosphonates is not well understood; however, they appear to exert their therapeutic effects through osteoclast activity.
Although bisphosphonates are valuable agents in reducing the risk of skeletal-related events in breast cancer patients, it is clear that improved treatments are needed. Despite the initiation of a bisphosphonate therapy, up to two-thirds of breast cancer patients will experience a skeletal-related event. The benefits of bisphosphonate therapy are also time-dependent; the reduction in skeletal-related morbidity is generally observed after 6 months of therapy. Moreover, the use of bisphosphonates has been associated with severe adverse events, including renal impairment, hypocalcaemia and osteonecrosis of the jaw. Generally, bisphosphonates have not been shown to increase survival in breast cancer patients with bone metastases.
There are currently several bisphosphonates that have been approved in the US for the treatment of bone metastases in patients with breast cancer; however, it is unknown whether one bisphosphonate is clearly better than the others, when both efficacy and safety are considered. Outstanding questions regarding the use of bisphosphonates also include, when to start therapy, the duration of therapy, and which patients are likely to benefit from bisphosphonates. Thus, there is a need to review the clinical data regarding the use of bisphosphonates in the treatment of breast cancer patients with metastases to the bone and to discuss both efficacy and safety issues pertaining to the use of these agents.
The bone of patients with breast cancer can also be compromised with the use of aromatase inhibitors and other treatments that target the estrogen pathway. These agents have been shown to decrease bone mineral density, increase bone turnover markers and induce bone loss. Currently, breast cancer patients who receive aromatase inhibitors are also treated with bisphosphonates. Thus, there is a need to discuss the management of bone integrity in breast cancer patients who receive hormonal therapy.
Increased understanding of bone biology and the process of bone metastasis have led to the identification of a new molecular target for the development of drug therapies: RANK Ligand. The expression of RANK Ligand is stimulated by cancer cells upon metastasis to the bone. When RANK Ligand is secreted, it activates a variety of osteotropic factors and induces osteoclast formation. By blocking RANK Ligand, bone remodeling is inhibited. A phase II clinical trial of breast cancer patients with bone metastases revealed a reduction in bone turnover markers and an increase of the estimated time to first (on-study) skeletal-related event in patients who received an investigational monoclonal antibody targeting RANK Ligand compared to patients who received IV bisphosphonates. Because RANK Ligand is a new target for the treatment of patients with bone metastases, a review of the biology of RANK Ligand and the results of clinical trials targeting RANK Ligand is warranted. Currently, a phase III clinical trial to evaluate inhibition of RANK Ligand for the treatment of breast cancer patients with bone metastases is underway.
The following is list of all 8 sessions
|
Agenda |
|
1. |
The effects of both the breast malignancy and breast cancer therapy on the biology of the bone
Gregory R. Mundy, MD |
|
2. |
Maintaining bone integrity of breast cancer patients using bisphosphonates
Allan Lipton, MD |
|
3. |
Case Study: 64 y/o female with ER+PR+HER2- breast cancer and bone metastases
Allan Lipton, MD |
| 4. |
Three Case Studies on the treatment of bone metastases in breast cancer patients
Catherine Van Poznak, MD |
|
5. |
Case Study: 75 y/o Post-menopausal woman with osteoporosis who refuses to take bisphosphonates for fear of ONJ
Theresa A. Guise, MD |
|
6. |
Can we improve the bone healthof breast cancer patients by targeting the biology of the bone?
Theresa A. Guise, MD |
|
7. |
Evaluating the strategy of inhibiting RANK Ligand in the
treatment of breast cancer: a review of clinical data
Allan Lipton, MD |
|
8. |
The potential role for RANK Ligand inhibition in
the management of bone integrity in patients with
metastatic breast cancer
Catherine Van Poznak, MD |
|
|
|
Educational Objectives
At the conclusion of all of these enduring materials, you should be able to:
- Evaluate the effects of breast cancer metastasis on the molecular biology of the bone
- Evaluate the impact that bisphosphonates have on bone integrity and bone health
- Consider the impact of skeletal-related events on quality of life and overall survival in patients with breast cancer
- Evaluate preclinical and clinical data on the inhibition of RANK Ligand as a strategy to maintain bone health and integrity in breast cancer patients
- Describe how enrollment in clinical trials to evaluate experimental agents such as denosumab, gallium, compounds targeting cathepsin K and src inhibitors can be a part of an overall strategy to maintain bone health and integrity for your breast cancer patients
Target Audience
This educational activity is designed to meet the educational needs of
clinical oncologists and hematologists who have an interest in the treatment of breast cancer patients who may develop skeletal-related events, or who have developed bone metastases. There are
no prerequisites or relevant system barriers to this activity.
CME Accreditation & Credit Designation
The Oncology Learning Center is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
The Oncology Learning Center designates this educational activity for a maximum of 2 AMA PRA Category 1
Credits™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
CME Certificate or Certificate of Participation
The relevant section(s) of the Evaluation Form pertaining to the session(s) of the enduring materials you have viewed or listened to, and the Request for Credit Form must be completed and submitted to the Oncology Learning Center following your participation in the enduring material educational activity to obtain CME credit. Physicians and other participants will be able to print their certificates after they complete these Forms.
Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest
In accordance with the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) Standards for Commercial Support, educational programs sponsored by the Oncology Learning Center must demonstrate balance, independence, objectivity, and scientific rigor. All faculty, authors, editors, and planning committee members participating in an OLC-sponsored activity are required to disclose any relevant financial interest or other relationship with the manufacturer(s) of any commercial product(s) and/or provider(s) of commercial services that are discussed in an educational activity. |
|
Faculty Disclosures
It is the policy of The Oncology Learning Center™, Inc. (OLC) to ensure that all of its educational activities and materials are of the highest quality, and are balanced, objective, independent, free of commercial bias, and planned and developed with scientific rigor with strict adherence to all Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) rules and policies. The OLC evaluates all content, faculty and faculty disclosures for any potential conflicts of interest. Should any conflicts of interest be identified these conflicts are resolved in advance of the educational activity by independent peer reviewers who are experts in the subjects of the educational activity.
All faculty and OLC staff participating in the content, planning or implementation of an educational CME activity are required to disclose to the audience of the educational activity any relevant financial relationships or interests and to assist in the resolution of any conflict of interest that may arise from the relationship(s) or interest(s). It is also the policy of the OLC to require all faculty presenters to make a meaningful disclosure to the audience of their discussions of unlabeled or FDA unapproved drugs, products, tests or devices. This information will be available as part of the educational activity and related material.
The following faculty and OLC staff have reported real or potential relevant conflicts of interest and these conflicts have been resolved, prior to this educational activity through a peer-review process by two medical oncologists who have had no affiliation with this educational activity other than the peer review process. This is documented on this page immediately following the financial disclosures below.
|
Allan Lipton, MD
Consultant: Amgen, Novartis, Merck, GTx Inc.
Contracted Research: Novartis, Monogram Biosciences
Gregory R. Mundy, MD
Consultant: Roche Diagnostics
Ownership Interest: OsteoGenix, OsteoScreen
I have no real or apparent conflicts of interest to report.
I intend to reference unlabeled/unapproved uses of drugs or products in my
presentation
Theresa A. Guise, MD
Consultant: Amgen, Novartis, Merck
Contracted Research: Scios
Catherine Van Poznak, MD
Consultant: Amgen
I intend to reference unlabeled/unapproved uses of drugs or products in my
presentation
Oncology Learning Center Staff
We have no real or apparent conflicts of interest to report.
|
Faculty Affiliations
Gregory R. Mundy, MD
John A. Oates in Translational Medicine
Director, Vanderbilt Center for Bone Biology
Professor of Medicine, Pharmacology,
Orthopaedics, Cancer Biology
Vanderbilt University
Nashville, TN
|
|
Allan Lipton, MD
Professor of Medicine & Oncology
M.S. Hershey Medical Center of the
Pennsylvania State University
|
Theresa A. Guise, MD
Gerald D. Aurbach Professor
Endocrinology
Processor of Internal Medicine
Director of Osteoporosis and Metabolic
Bone Disease Clinic
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, VA
|
|
Catherine Van Poznak, MD
Assistant Professor
Division of Hematology/Oncology
Department of Internal Medicine
University of Michigan
Comprehensive Cancer Center
Ann Arbor, MI
|
|
Peer Review Process of Conflicts of Interest
Drs. Jennifer Ligibel of the Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, and Patrick J. Flynn of US Oncology in Minneapolis, MN have independently peer-reviewed this enduring material educational activity.
Disclosure of Unlabeled Uses
This educational activity may contain discussion of published and/or investigational uses of agents that are not indicated by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). For additional information about approved uses, including approved indications, contraindications, and warnings, please refer to the prescribing information for each product or consult the Physicians’ Desk Reference.
The Oncology Learning Center (OLC) does not recommend the use of any agent outside of the FDA labeled indications. The opinions expressed in the educational activity are those of the faculty and do not necessarily represent the views of the OLC. Please refer to the official FDA prescribing information for each product for discussion of approved indicated, contraindications, and warnings.
Acknowledgement of Supporters
| Educational Grants |
Sincere appreciation is extended to Amgen for their generous support of this educational meeting |
 |
|