Login or Register
Biomedical Learning Institute Taught by the Experts
Thought Leaders
Biomedical Learning Institute
Please Note: The Oncology Learning Center has changed its name to Biomedical Learning Institute
Co-Chairs
Dr. Rosell

Rafael Rosell, MD, PhD
Chief, Medical Oncology Service
Scientific Director of Oncology Research
Catala Institute of Oncology
Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol
Barcelona, Spain
Dr. Ramanathan

Ramesh K. Ramanathan, MD
Medical Director,
TGen Clinical Research Service
at Scottsdale Health Care
Scottsdale, AZ
Clinical Professor of Medicine,
College of Medicine
University of Arizona
Phoenix, AZ
 

CME CREDIT INFORMATION

Release Date: 07/08/09

Expiration Date: 07/08/10


Physicians: maximum of 2 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits

CME-Accredited Webcasts, Presentation and Audio Downloads, and i-Tunes Podcast Downloads
4 case studies with questions from the audience
Using Biomarkers to Maximize Novel Taxane Therapies in Multiple Tumor Types: Case-Based Learning
held during ASCO 2009 as an ancillary event in Orlando, FL on May 30, 2009

You may participate in any or all of the sessions for CME credit or a Certificate of Attendance after you review the required ACCME (Accreditation Council on Continuing Medical Education) information on this page.
Menu
Overview and Faculty Disclosures >> Sessions >> Evaluation & Certificate
Overview of This CME-Accredited Educational Activity

Your Options for Methods of Participation are:
  1. View and/or listen to any of the sessions (listed below) via an Adobe Flash Webcast
  2. Download any presentation
  3. Download any audio only as MP3s or Podcasts
  4. Request a DVD-ROM of all sessions

There are 4 case studies with questions from the audience.  Each of these sessions is approximately 20 minutes in length. Sessions can be individually reviewed for credit. You can participate in as few or as many as you desire.

CME-Accredited Educational Activity Dates and Time to Complete
Date of release: July 8, 2009
Date expires (CME credit will not be avaliable): July 8, 2010
Average time to complete each individual session: 20 minutes
Time to complete entire activity: 2 hours
Overview

This independent, continuing medical education (CME) Internet-Based Activity has been planned and is conducted by the Oncology Learning Center, Inc., which is a CME provider accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education.

The following four malignancies will each be reviewed as a challenging clinical case study: breast cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, and metastatic melanoma. The latest clinical data regarding the treatment of these tumor types with novel taxane therapies will be reviewed. The potential to use biomarkers, including those involved in the bio-distribution of chemotherapy to tumor cells as predictive factors for response to treatment or to assess the risk of disease progression, will be discussed.

The format of this Internet-Based Activity is highly interactive and utilizes adult learning principles. Four medical oncology experts who use biomarkers and novel taxanes to treat solid malignancies will each present one challenging clinical case and then engage the audience with a few patient treatment questions using the Audience Response System (ARS). Next, the entire faculty will comment on the answers, and the presenting faculty member for each case will review some additional data to provide the most up-to-date clinical and scientific information for clinicians.

Before the Internet-Based Activity begins, a pre-activity educational test consisting of several patient care, treatment strategy questions with multiple-choice answers will be asked of the audience to determine the baseline of how they currently treat their patients with these malignancies. These questions will be asked at the conclusion of the Internet-Based Activity, and asked yet again of willing participants three to four months following the symposium to determine how the Internet-Based Activity has changed their practices.

Educational Needs Statement

Despite the increasing availability of novel or targeted anti-cancer therapies, the backbone of treatment regimens for most solid tumors remains chemotherapy. Nevertheless, many cancer patients still fail to achieve a complete response or a partial response to systemic treatment. And many patients who achieve an initial response relapse due to the presence of residual disease.

Molecular biomarkers are becoming increasingly important as predictive and as prognostic factors to help increase the overall efficacy of systemic anti-cancer therapy with taxanes and with other chemotherapy agents for many solid malignancies.

There are several potential biomarkers that may help predict response to taxane therapy. And at least two different approaches to novel taxane therapy are being evaluated, liposomal taxane formulations and a nanopartical, albumin-bound taxane formulation. However, only the nanoparticle, albumin-bound taxane is available commercially. High beta-tubulin expression has been linked to resistance to docetaxel. And high expression of SPARC by the tumor, and expression of caveolin-1 may enhance the value of nanoparticle, albumin-bound paclitaxel therapy.

Because of the improved efficacy and safety profiles of novel taxane formulations, clinical trials are ongoing to validate their role for improving therapy for several solid malignancies including breast cancer, lung cancer, pancreatic cancer and melanoma. The optimal use of biomarkers to help maximize the use of novel taxanes in multiple tumor types is an educational need that is the focus of this symposium.

The following is list of all sessions

1a.
Case Study #1: A previously untreated patient with advanced pancreatic cancer tested for CA 19-9 and SPARC
Ramesh K. Ramanathan, MD
1b.
Case Study #2: A previously untreated patient with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer of adenocarcinoma histology, tested for the EGFR mutation, ERCC1, RRM1, and thymidylate synthase
Rafael Rosell, MD, PhD
1c.
Case Study #3: A patient with locally advanced, early-stage breast cancer, tested for ER/PR, HER2, SPARC, the 21 genomic assay panel, and the 70-gene micro array
Jeffrey R. Infante, MD
1d.
Case Study #4: A patient with unresectable Stage IV metastatic melanoma tested for SPARC
Svetomir N. Markovic, MD, PhD
Educational Objectives

At the conclusion of all of these enduring materials, you should be able to:
  1. Determine the optimal role of gene expression profile assays, molecular biomarkers and clinical information in the development of personalized treatment for patients with solid malignancies.
  2. Explain why novel formulations of taxane-based chemotherapy can overcome barriers to achieving higher response rates and how these novel formulations can enhance the biodistribution of taxane-based chemotherapy and help localize the anti-cancer drugs to the site of the tumor.
  3. Assess the role of cellular proteins in the biodistribution of taxane-based chemotherapy and evaluate the role of these proteins as predictive biomarkers for the efficacy of novel chemotherapy formulations in personalized regimens.
  4. Evaluate the impact of dose and dose schedule on the optimal clinical use of taxane-based regimens in the treatment of solid tumors.
  5. Compare and contrast the clinical efficacy, tolerability and safety of novel taxane formulations with that of conventional solvent-based paclitaxel and docetaxel for the treatment of solid malignancies.
  6. Evaluate the role of personalized taxane-based therapies in combination regimens for patients with breast cancer and other solid tumors.
Target Audience

Because solid malignancies are treated by a team of specialists, the content is focused on medical oncologists and hematologists/oncologists, but attendance is open to all who care for patients with cancer. New developments in cancer treatment are evolving at a rapid pace. Therefore, scientists also may decide to participate in this educational activity to learn about the newest trends and evidence available. Potential participants may also include researchers, nurses, pharmacists and other members of the interdisciplinary cancer care team.
CME Accreditation & Credit Designation

The Oncology Learning Center is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.

The Oncology Learning Center designates this educational activity for a maximum of 2 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

CME Certificate or Certificate of Participation

The relevant section(s) of the Evaluation Form pertaining to the session(s) of the enduring materials you have viewed or listened to, and the Request for Credit Form must be completed and submitted to the Oncology Learning Center following your participation in the enduring material educational activity to obtain CME credit. Physicians and other participants will be able to print their certificates after they complete these Forms.
Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest

In accordance with the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) Standards for Commercial Support, educational programs sponsored by the Oncology Learning Center must demonstrate balance, independence, objectivity, and scientific rigor. All faculty, authors, editors, and planning committee members participating in an OLC-sponsored activity are required to disclose any relevant financial interest or other relationship with the manufacturer(s) of any commercial product(s) and/or provider(s) of commercial services that are discussed in an educational activity.
Faculty Disclosures

It is the policy of the Oncology Learning Center, Inc. (OLC) to ensure that all of its educational activities and materials are of the highest quality, and are balanced, objective, independent, free of commercial bias, and planned and developed with scientific rigor with strict adherence to all Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) rules and policies. The OLC evaluates all content, faculty and faculty disclosures for any potential conflicts of interest. Should any conflicts of interest be identified these conflicts are resolved in advance of the educational activity by independent peer reviewers who are experts in the subjects of the educational activity.

All faculty and OLC staff participating in the content, planning or implementation of an educational CME activity are required to disclose to the audience of the educational activity any relevant financial relationships or interests and to assist in the resolution of any conflict of interest that may arise from the relationship(s) or interest(s). It is also the policy of the OLC to require all faculty presenters to make a meaningful disclosure to the audience of their discussions of unlabeled or FDA unapproved drugs, products, tests or devices. This information will be available as part of the educational activity and related material.

The following faculty and OLC staff have reported real or potential relevant conflicts of interest and these conflicts have been resolved, prior to this educational activity through a peer-review process by two medical oncologists who have had no affiliation with this educational activity other than the peer review process.  This is documented on this page immediately following the financial disclosures below.

Rafael Rosell, MD, PhD
I have no real or apparent conflicts of interest to report.
Ramesh K. Ramanathan, MD
Contracted Research: Abraxis
I intend to reference unlabeled/unapproved uses of drugs or products in my presentation.
Svetomir N. Markovic, MD, PhD
I have no real or apparent conflicts of interest to report.
Jeffrey R. Infante, MD
I have no real or apparent conflicts of interest to report.
Oncology Learning Center staff
We have no real or apparent conflicts of interest to report.
Faculty Affiliations

Rafael Rosell, MD, PhD
Chief, Medical Oncology Service
Scientific Director of Oncology Research
Catala Institute of Oncology
Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol
Barcelona, Spain

  Ramesh K. Ramanathan, MD
Medical Director,
TGen Clinical Research Service
at Scottsdale Health Care
Scottsdale, AZ
Clinical Professor of Medicine,
College of Medicine
University of Arizona
Phoenix, AZ

Svetomir N. Markovic, MD, PhD
Associate Professor of Oncology
Professor of Medicine
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, MN

  Jeffrey R. Infante, MD
Associate Director of Drug Development
Sarah Cannon Research Institute
Nashville, TN

Peer Review Process of Conflicts of Interest

This educational activity has been independently peer-reviewed.
Disclosure of Unlabeled Uses

This educational activity may contain discussion of published and/or investigational uses of agents that are not indicated by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). For additional information about approved uses, including approved indications, contraindications, and warnings, please refer to the prescribing information for each product or consult the Physicians’ Desk Reference.

The Oncology Learning Center (OLC) does not recommend the use of any agent outside of the FDA labeled indications. The opinions expressed in the educational activity are those of the faculty and do not necessarily represent the views of the OLC. Please refer to the official FDA prescribing information for each product for discussion of approved indicated, contraindications, and warnings.

Acknowledgement of Supporters

Sincere appreciation is extended to Abraxis Oncology for their generous support of this educational activity

Abraxis Oncology


I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTOOD THE FACULTY DISCLOSURES
Please check the box above before you click the button below.
© 2012 Biomedical Learning Institute
1415 Legacy Drive, Suite 250 • Frisco, TX 75034 • Registration Phone: 214.269.2014 • Fax: 214.866.0311
Contact Us
Disclaimer: The material published on the Biomedical Learning Institute(BLI) Web site reflects the opinions and expertise of the authors and/or reviewers of the material, and not the opinions of the BLI, the CME provider, or the commercial supporters providing educational grants. The materials may address uses and dosages for therapeutic products that have not been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration. Before using any therapeutic approaches reviewed in this material, a qualified physician should be consulted. Readers of this content should verify all information and data before treating patients or using any drugs or therapies described in any BLI materials. Click here for our Privacy Policy.